Go to APO Home pageAcademic Personnel ManualThe UCLA CallForms and ChecklistsSalary ScalesDossier Action Tracking application

Academic Personnel Office
University of California,
Los Angeles


3109 Murphy Hall
Box 951407
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1407
(310) 825-3841
(310) 206-9643 Fax



2001-2002
Communiqués from the
 Vice Chancellor of Academic Personnel

 

Important Notice (Distribute by Monday, July 1, 2002)
   Whistleblower Notification
        Issued June 28, 2002

   César Chávez Holiday
        Issued June 26, 2002

 

   Revised Policy on Supplement to Military Pay
        Issued June 21, 2002

   Procedure Modification to Academic Personnel Manual 025
        Issued May 21, 2002

  
Faculty Retention Survey
        Issued April 9, 2002

  
César Chávez Day
        Issued February 8, 2002

  
Faculty Career Development Awards
        Issued January 28, 2002  --> Deadline Thursday, March 7, 2002


  
2002-2003 Nominations for Regents’ Professors and Lecturers
     
  Issued January 24, 2002  --> Deadline Monday, February 25, 2002

   Reappointment Guidelines for Rehired Retirees
       Issued January 11, 2002


  
2002 Academic Personnel Advanced Topics Workshop
        Issued December 3, 2001

  
Recruitment and Retention of Faculty
        Issued November 8, 2001     

  
Faculty Service on Ad Hoc Review Committees
        Issued November 2, 2001


   
2001-02 Academic Salary Plan
        Issued October 9, 2001

  
Dissemination of Policy Proposals
        
Issued October 9, 2001

   2001-02 Academic Salary Plan
          Available in
.pdf format
         
Issued September 14, 2001

   2001-2002 Submission Deadlines (available in .pdf format )

             Issued September 7, 2001
  New APM Policy regarding Conflict of Commitment and Outside Activities of
     Faculty Members
Issued August 21, 2001
>>Comments due
Friday, September 14, 2001    



  2003-2004 Vice Chancellor Communiqués
  2002-2003 Vice Chancellor Communiqués
  2000-2001 Vice Chancellor Communiqués
  1999-2000 Vice Chancellor Communiqués
  1998-1999 Vice Chancellor Communiqués
  1997-1998 Vice Chancellor Communiqués

<<  Return to Current Year Communiqués
 

 



I M P O R T A N T   N O T I C E


June 28, 2002

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, and DIRECTORS

Re: Posting and Notification Requirements Under the California Whistleblower Protection Act

We have recently learned of new provisions in the California Whistleblower Protection Act (Government Code Sections 8548.2 and 8548.3), which require the University to implement the following requirements:

  1. by July 1, 2002, Post A Notice explaining provisions of the Act in locations where employee notices are maintained, and 
  2. on July 1, 2002 and annually thereafter, Send the Notice by Electronic Mail to employees who have UC-authorized access to e-mail.

As required by law, a basic notice that was prepared by the State Auditor is being utilized, but has been augmented with University-specific information. In the future, we will send you updated notices, if any, and annual reminders to e-mail the notice to employees on July 1.

The revised Whistleblower and Whistleblower Protection policies will be issued in the near future. Office of the President is working on putting together implementation tools such as guidelines, Questions & Answers, and training, and will be in touch with you as these are developed.

An email notification along with a flyer attachment will be sent to your Dean's office. Please ensure that the flyer is posted in a location accessible to all employees and that the email is forwarded to ALL academic employees within your department. The Whistleblower Flyer and other important notices can be found on the Academic Personnel's Academic Appointment Opportunities web site at http://www.apo.ucla.edu/aao.htm.

We would very much appreciate your assistance in ensuring that the above requirements are complied with on or before Monday, July 1, 2002.

Sincerely,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D. 
Vice Chancellor Academic Personnel

Enclosure [Whistleblower Notice]
 


 

June 26, 2002

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

Re: César Chávez Holiday

The University of California has approved renaming the spring Administrative Holiday in honor of César Chávez, the late president of the United Farm Workers of America. César Chávez Day will be observed on the last Friday in March and phased in at all locations by calendar year 2005. 

For represented academic employees, this holiday change will be subject to negotiations.  The policy is available online at:

http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/coordrev/policy/6-05-02.html

Thank you for your attention to this matter.                                           

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 

 


 

June 21, 2002

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

 

Re: Revised Policy on Supplement to Military Pay

Under current University policy, employees who have been called to or who volunteer for active military duty during Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Noble Eagle (the anti-terrorism and homeland defense campaigns), or any other active military duty meant to support the President’s call for a war on terrorism as a result of the September 11 attacks, receive supplements to their military for a period not to exceed 180 days.

Effective May 28, 2002, this special pay supplement will be extended by 185 days for a total duration of up to 365 days. For employees who have already received the 180 days of supplemental pay, the additional pay will be retroactive to the first day of unpaid military leave following the 180 days of supplemental pay.

Enclosed are the revised policy pages (3, 5 and 7).  More information can be found online at the following websites:

Implementing Guidelines (Policy)
http://www.ucop.edu/humres/mil_pay_guide.pdf

Supplement to Military Pay Worksheet 
http://www.ucop.edu/humres/mil_pay_wrksht.pdf

Extended Military Leave Questions and Answers
http://www.ucop.edu/humres/mil_leave_faq.pdf

Thank you for your attention to this matter.                                           

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 





May 21, 2002

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

Re: Procedure Modification to Academic Personnel Manual 025

I am writing to modify guidance provided in my memo of November 19, 2001.  That memo was sent to alert you to several important revisions to the Academic Personnel Manual, including significant revision of APM 025, “Conflict of Commitment and Outside Activities of Faculty Members.”  It indicated that under APM 025, prior approval is required before faculty can engage in certain kinds of endeavors that may give rise to either real or perceived conflicts of interest.  These “Category I” activities include:

  1. Assumption of an executive or managerial position in a for-profit or not-for-profit business;

  2. Establishment of a relationship as a salaried employee outside the University (other than the delivery of occasional lectures or participation in UC-sponsored continuing education programs); and

  3. Submission of contract and grant proposals through organizations outside the University of California.

My memo indicated that delegation to approve those activities had been given to the Deans.  In re-reviewing APM 025, however we realize that under separate, existing policy on submission of contract and grant proposals through outside organizations, authority to approve exceptions has already been delegated to the Vice Chancellor – Research.  Thus, upon reconsideration, the delegation of authority to approve Category I activities to the Deans has been modified to include only the first two items: the assumption of an executive or managerial position and/or the establishment of a salaried position outside the University.  Authority to approve submission of contract and grant proposals requesting research support through outside organizations will remain with the Vice Chancellor – Research.  This change is effective immediately.

I think it may also be useful for you to remind faculty that positions and/or resulting income or equity holdings must be disclosed later if subsequent research support from the same organization is sought.  Under State of California regulations and University of California policy, the faculty Independent Substantive Review Committee (ISRC) must review disclosure of economic interests prior to acceptance of research gifts, grants or contracts.  If, upon review, the ISRC determines that the financial interest constitutes a significant conflict of interest, they may recommend to the Vice Chancellor – Research actions designed to manage, reduce, or eliminate that conflict.  This determination will be made independent of the fact that the Dean previously approved those activities. 

Should you have concerns about this revised guidance, please feel free to contact me at extension 69453.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 

cc: Vice Chancellor Roberto Peccei 
 


 

April 9, 2002

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

Re: Faculty Retention Survey

This is to advise you that Office of the President (OP) will be conducting a survey on faculty retention.  This is a part of a larger survey they normally conduct every two years.  The other part of the survey will be conducted next year.  The data produced from the retention survey will be used in evaluating retention practices and in preparing for discussions with the legislature about faculty retention issues.

Beginning next week, a staff member from OP will be calling selected Department Chairs with a brief set of questions about tenured and non-tenured faculty who left the University during the 2000-01 academic year.  As always, we want to assure Chairs that all responses will be treated confidentially. 

If you have any questions or suggestions, please call Chris Simon at (510) 987-9404.  Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this effort.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 




February 8, 2002 

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, and DIRECTORS

Re:  Renaming Administrative Holiday to César Chávez Day

The University of California is proposing to rename its administrative holiday in honor of César Chávez, the late president of the United Farm Workers of America.  It is proposed that César Chávez Day be observed on the last Friday in March, and that the holiday be phased in at all locations by calendar year 2005.  As of this writing, the proposed UCLA implementation date is unknown, but will be no later than 2005.  Further communication will follow.

For represented academic employees, this proposal will be subject to negotiations.  

The proposed policy is available online at:

http://www.ucop.edu/humres/prophsr_vcletter.pdf

Please make this information available to your faculty and all interested parties for comment.  I would appreciate receiving all comments by Wednesday, February 27, 2002.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 
 



January 28, 2002

ASSISTANT PROFESSORS, DEANS and DEPARTMENT CHAIRS

Re: Faculty Career Development Awards for Regular Rank Assistant Professors for the Period July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003

Proposals are now being accepted for the Faculty Career Development Program (FCDP). This program provides junior faculty with research support at a critical time in the pre-tenure stage. Awards are made in the form of summer ninths, one-quarter sabbatical supplements, full quarter research leaves with salary, and a lump-sum of $3,000.

These awards provide support for assistant professors in developing the research or creative record that is essential for promotion to associate professor. Applicants should be prepared to devote their time exclusively to the projects for which the awards are requested. To provide maximum benefit, Career Development Awards typically are made prior to tenure review and after the first year of course preparation and dissertation revision. Eligibility requirements are as follows:

1. Applications are invited from assistant professors in the regular professorial series, with the exception of individuals for whom 2002-2003 will be the final year at UCLA as assistant professors because of resignation, non-reappointment, or promotion.

2. Individuals who will be in the seventh year of service during the year of the award may apply for summer ninths or other support of $3,000.

3. Individuals with fiscal-year appointments may apply for one-quarter sabbatical leave supplements, one-quarter leave with salary, or other support of $3,000. The support of $3,000 may not be used as a part of summer salary.

4. Prior Career Development Award recipients may apply for research support under this program. At the final selection stage, priority normally will be given to those who have not had previous awards.

5. The academic personnel policy regarding a sabbatical leave is applied to Faculty Career Development Awards. Failure to return to regular University employment after sabbatical leave for a period at least equal to the period of the leave shall create an obligation on the part of the appointee to refund the entire salary received for the period of a regular sabbatical leave. This requirement for repayment may not be waived without the specific approval of the Chancellor. Please see APM 740-16 for details.

Applicants should submit three copies of the following materials to their Department Chairs:

1. Completed application form.

2. Proposal, two to three pages in length, outlining information on career plans and progress as well as a detailed description of the project to be undertaken during the award period.

3. Curriculum vitae.

Applications should be paper-clipped but not stapled.

The review process for all applications is as follows:

1. The Department Chair will forward all application packets to the Dean with a recommended priority listing and comments, including any departmental advisory committee comments in each packet.

2. The Dean will forward all application packets to the Academic Personnel Office with an overall priority listing and comments in each packet.

3. At the recommendation of the Academic Senate's Committee on Committees, a committee of faculty members will be appointed to review the applications and make recommendations to the Chancellor. Please note the following deadlines:

  • Department Chair from applicants: February 20, 2002
  • Dean from Chairs: February 27, 2002
  • Academic Personnel Office from Deans: March 7, 2002

Notification letters to all applicants will be sent promptly after award decisions are finalized in early May. Detailed information regarding the Faculty Career Development Award Program can be found on the Academic Personnel Office web site at:

http://www.apo.ucla.edu/programs.htm

Please call Alexis Shaw at extension 54785 if you have any questions regarding the policies and procedures of this program.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 


 




January 24, 2002

VICE CHANCELLORS, DEANS, DIRECTORS and DEPARTMENT CHAIRS

Re: 2002-2003 Nominations for Regents’ Professors and Lecturers

The Regents of the University of California have established the Regents’ Professors and Lecturers Program, which permits the appointment, on a visiting basis, of distinguished leaders from non-academic fields to enrich our instructional program.

I am writing to inform you that nominations are now open for appointment as Regents’ Professors and Lecturers for the 2002-2003 academic year.

Regents’ Lecturers are expected to be available for participation in the instructional activities of the sponsoring department and other interested academic units, and for informal consultations with students and faculty. Since teaching and student contact are essential under this program, Regents’ Lecturer appointments are to be scheduled during the instructional period when students may enjoy the maximum benefit of these appointments. At the invitation of the responsible instructors, Regents’ Lecturers may address regular class sessions. A Regents’ Professor serves for one quarter and is normally assigned responsibility for the instruction of one or more courses at the discretion of the department chair. Each Regents’ Lecturer and Regents’ Professor normally gives one public lecture.

The term of service for a Regents’ Lecturer may not exceed two weeks with a compensation rate of $3,750 per week. The compensation rate for a Regents’ Professor is $42,767 per quarter. You may also recommend that a round-trip economy airfare be provided.  It is expected that 5-7 appointments of Regents’ Lecturers will be made for the 2002-2003 academic year. Because of budget limitations, generally only one Regents’ Professor will be appointed. You may request that your Regents’ Professor nominees also be considered in the Regents’ Lecturer category.

Each school, college, or officially designated division within a school or college may submit as many as five nominations. Nominations by an organized research unit must be co-sponsored by an academic department. Academic units should contact potential nominees in advance to assure their availability.  In making a nomination, please include information on professional achievements, employment history, awards and honors, publications and/or creative work. In addition, indicate specifically what the nominee’s teaching activities and student contact will be, and how the nominating academic unit will benefit from the appointment. Because of the competitive nature of this program, a full presentation of the nominees’ credentials is essential. If airfare is requested, an estimate of the travel cost should be indicated. The academic quarter proposed for residence should be noted in the letter of nomination.

The Department Chair should forward the nominations to the Dean with comments. The Dean should then forward the nominations to the Academic Personnel Office, 3109 Murphy Hall, with an overall priority listing and comments by Monday, February 25, 2002.

A faculty committee will be appointed to review the nominations and to make recommendations to the Chancellor. Please note that Regents’ Lecturer appointments are subject to Chancellor’s approval while, Regents’ Professor appointments require the approval of the Board of Regents.

Appointees to these titles are subject to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. It is necessary to establish the citizenship status of a nominee before a financial commitment is made and before the arrival of an appointee.  Your office should review the current visa status of a nominee at the earliest possible date.

Detailed information regarding the Regents’ Professors and Lecturers Program can be found on the Academic Personnel Office web site at:

http://www.apo.ucla.edu/regents.htm

Please call Alexis Shaw at extension 54785, if you have any questions regarding the policies and procedures of this program.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 

 



January 11, 2002

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, and DIRECTORS

Re: Reappointment Guidelines for Rehired Retirees

As you are aware, recent changes in the University of California Retirement Plan (UCRP) eligibility requirements resulted in a review of policies related to the reappointment of retirees.

Current guidelines provide, in part, that reappointment of a retiree must occur not earlier than the receipt of the first retirement payment or 90 days after the retiree’s retirement date, whichever occurs first. This provision was adopted to ensure continuation of the University’s longstanding policy objective that a minimum break in service of at least 30 calendar days be observed in an effort to comply with Internal Revenue Code in-service distribution rules. However, in recent months, the process for the distribution of retirement checks has been enhanced and accelerated. It is now possible for some retirees to receive their first retirement check within a few days of their retirement date. Thus, in order to ensure that a sufficient break in service occurs, the guidelines have been modified as follows:

Reappointment of a UC retiree may occur no earlier than 90 days after the retiree’s retirement date or receipt of the first retirement payment (or lump-sum cashout), whichever occurs first. However, in no case shall a rehired retiree return to work before 30 calendar days from the termination date, even if the retiree has received his or her first retirement payment. In addition, any agreements to rehire such an employee may occur only after a 30-day break in service has passed.

The University-wide “Guidelines for Rehire of UC Retirees” can be accessed on the Office of the President website at http://exchange.ucop.edu/tempemp/guiderehire.html.

Local policy and procedures regarding recall appointments can be found in The CALL, Appendix 28. If you have any questions regarding this policy, please contact Alexis Shaw in the Academic Personnel Office at extension 54785.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel

 


 

December 3, 2001

DEANS and DEPARTMENT CHAIRS

Re:  2002 Academic Personnel Advanced Topics Workshop

Dear Colleagues:

Each year the Academic Personnel Office hosts an Advanced Topics Workshop to address various aspects of academic-personnel policies and procedures.  This workshop will focus on issues relating to faculty recruitment, leaves, and tenure.  It will be held on January 31, and I ask that you please hold that date on your calendars if you wish to attend.  You will receive an agenda and additional information in January.

2002 Academic Personnel Advanced Topics Workshop
Thursday, January 31
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
California Room, Faculty Center

I look forward to seeing you there.

Sincerely yours,

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel


 


 

November 8, 2001

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

Re: Recruitment and Retention of Faculty

President Atkinson recently issued a revised set of UC Affirmative Action Guidelines for the Recruitment and Retention of Faculty (copy enclosed and available online at http://www.apo.ucla.edu/facinfo.htm).  These guidelines respond to the State Auditor’s report on UC-faculty hiring, which recommends that we increase efforts and monitor the results to ensure gender parity in faculty hiring.  The State Auditor’s report also is available online, at http://www.bsa.ca.gov/bsa/pdfs/2000131.pdf.  Our campus has begun implementing these recommendations, and will be taking related actions consistent with the UC guidelines.  I am writing to update you on our progress and to encourage focused and sustained efforts at diversifying the faculty.

As you may know, we are establishing an Office for Faculty Diversity within the Chancellor’s organization.  The search for an Associate Vice Chancellor for Faculty Diversity, who will report to me, is under way.  The appointee will serve as UCLA’s academic affirmative action officer, and will have primary responsibility and accountability for ensuring equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination in academic areas, and for developing and implementing our academic affirmative action program.  We also are recruiting for a Director of Academic Affirmative Action Research, who will be responsible for data collection, analysis, and reports, and will assist the Associate Vice Chancellor in ensuring that we fully meet our affirmative action responsibilities. 

We have begun discussing how to improve our faculty search procedures campuswide.  The revised UC guidelines helpfully provide a series of best practices for faculty recruitment and selection.  At this time, I am requesting that you introduce or continue three such practices, in particular:

1.       Consideration of equal opportunity and employment equity should begin early in the academic planning process before the search is authorized.  Please consider carefully during the allocation phase how new requested positions will affect employment opportunities for women and minorities, and the resulting diversity of the department faculty, division, and/or school. 

2.       Each department should make an effort to appoint a search committee that represents a diverse cross section of the faculty . . . .  For diverse perspec­tives, search committees may include junior as well as senior faculty, graduate student representatives, and/or individuals outside the department.  It is important that women and minorities not be asked to carry a disproportionate service burden in the interests of achieving diversity. 

3.       Each department should make an effort to appoint a search committee that . . . includes members who will monitor the affirmative action efforts of the search committee.  I ask that, on our campus, the search committee chair carry this responsibility.  Relevant materials are available on the Academic Personnel Office website.  

Please note that when a final candidate is identified and formal review commences, the CALL requires that the dossier include a report of the recruitment search.  Appendix 1, Section V indicates that it is the Department Chair’s responsibility to include in his/her recommendation, statements concerning the scope of the search and other candidates considered for the position. 

Thank you for following through on the Office of the President’s guidelines to recruit and retain a diverse faculty.  With everyone’s cooperation in implementing these best practices, UCLA will achieve its goal of creating a more diverse faculty that continues to be of the highest quality.

Sincerely,                             

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel

Enclosure

cc: Executive Vice Chancellor Wyatt R. Hume
     Executive Officer Connie Chittick
     Chair John Edmond, Academic Senate
     Policy Manager Alexis Shaw, Academic Personnel Office
    
Chair Russell Thornton, Council on Academic Personnel

 


 

November 2, 2001

PROVOSTS, DEANS, CHAIRS, DIRECTORS and FACULTY

Re: Faculty Service on Ad Hoc Review Committees

During the 2001-2002 Academic Year, you may be contacted by the Academic Personnel Office and asked to serve as a member of an ad hoc committee for an academic personnel case.  The Council on Academic Personnel will select you to participate on a particular review based on your expertise, rank/step and departmental affiliation.  In keeping with the spirit of shared governance, a key element in our academic review process has traditionally involved independent assessment of faculty performance by review committees.

As you may know, in recent years, we have taken steps to reduce the demand on faculty time for ad hoc committee service – for example, by reducing the membership of the ad hoc committee from five to four; and by not using review committees in many cases in which such committees were formerly used.  Both the Council on Academic Personnel and the Vice Chancellor are very sensitive to the time demands that such ad hoc committee service imposes.  Collegial evaluation remains, however, an essential ingredient in maintaining the academic standards that have made UCLA a first rank university.

We urge each member of the faculty to make this important service a matter of high priority.  Thank you. 

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.                     
Vice Chancellor, Academic Personnel

Russell Thornton, Chair
Council on Academic Personnel

 



P L E A S E   P O S T


October 9, 2001

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

Re: 2001-02 Academic Salary Plan

This is to announce that the University-Wide Academic Salary Scales for 2001-02 are available online at http://www.ucop.edu/acadadv/acadpers/tab0102/tabcont.html.

Salary Scales for academic appointees in non-represented titles have been adjusted by 0.5 percent with an effective date of October 1, 2001.  Off-Scale salaries and Above-Scale faculty are also subject to the 0.5 percent range adjustment.

The scales for the Professional Research Series continue to show salary ranges.  It is anticipated that all campuses will adjust salaries to the maximum salary of the range for each step, effective October 1, 2004.  Salaries paid in accordance with the Professional Research Series Business/Management and Engineering Professional Research scale should be adjusted to the maximum salary of the range for each step effective October 1, 2005.  By these aforementioned dates, the range will be collapsed into a single rate.

Certain student academic titles (Teaching Assistants and equivalents, Readers, Associates, Remedial Tutors, have also been range adjusted by 0.5 percent.  For student employees in any of these titles who are exclusively represented, the application of the range adjustment is subject to the requirements of the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA).

Academic salary scales for Lecturers and other Non-Senate Instructional Unit members who are exclusively represented are the subject of ongoing collective bargaining negotiations and will be published upon resolution of the negotiations.   A new salary scale for the title Faculty Fellow Researcher will also be published upon resolution of the negotiations.

The salary scale for Librarians, used for both represented and non-represented librarians, has also been range adjusted by 0.5 percent.   For librarians who are exclusively represented, the application of the range adjustment is subject to the requirements of the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA).

Local Salary Scales, specific to UCLA titles, policy and procedures, will be distributed by the Academic Personnel Office to Deans' offices during the week of October 15th and will be available online at http://www.apo.ucla.edu/salary.htm.

Sincerely,                           

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel
 



P L E A S E   P O S T


October 9, 2001

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, and DIRECTORS

Re: Dissemination of Policy Proposals

The Higher Education Employer Employee Relations Act (HEERA) requires the University to provide notice of draft policies to affected persons regarding changing terms and conditions of employment.  It is the responsibility of Deans, Chairs, and Directors upon receipt of a new policy proposal to ensure that each affected academic appointee is notified regarding the proposed change and afforded an opportunity to respond.  The Academic Personnel Office (APO) distributes policy proposals and cover letters in hard copy directly to you for action and follow-up.  As most schools also maintain various e-mail distribution lists, APO also provides an e-mail version of all policy proposals to each Dean’s Office to enable wide spread distribution among academic appointees. Faculty who cannot be reached through e-mail distribution should be provided a hard copy.  Formal policy proposals should also be posted on department bulletin boards.

Responses to the policy proposals can be accomplished via discussions at faculty meetings and communicated upon behalf of the department by a department letter addressed to my office.  Individuals may also address responses directly to my office, if they so choose.  Subsequently a campus response is prepared and sent to the Office of the President.  Faculty can also send their comments to the Academic Senate, which may prepare its own response to the Office of the President.

In addition, all policy proposals, including the cover letter and their status are available simultaneously on the Academic Personnel Office web site.  Status of policies under review can be found on the Policies Under Review page at:

http://www.apo.ucla.edu/poreview.htm

Each of us has an obligation to ensure that individuals are provided the opportunity to review and respond to proposed policy changes.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,                           

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel

 



P L E A S E  P O S T


September 14, 2001

DEANS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS and DIRECTORS

Re: 2001-02 Academic Salary Plan

The 2001-2002 California state budget includes funding for the regular annual general range adjustment for UC academic employees.  The University has sufficient funding for a 0.5% general range adjustment for UC academic employees for 2001-2002.   Increases are to be effective October 1, 2001. 

As you may also know, state revenues have been declining due to the recent economic downturn.  One consequence of this drop in state revenues has been a shortfall in funds provided to the University for staff and academic salary increases.  This shortfall for salaries was particularly disappointing given the momentum we had recently begun to build in this area.  We will continue to impress upon the Legislature and the governor the importance of full partnership funding for staff and academic employee salaries, and that it is critical to UC’s ability to continue to attract and recognize the kind of talent necessary to maintain UC as a leading educational institution, and a leading employer.

Salary actions for exclusively represented UC employees are subject to the terms of existing collective bargaining agreements or to meeting and conferring in accordance with provisions of the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA), as appropriate.  UCLA Salary Scales will be mailed out shortly.

Sincerely,                           

Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
Vice Chancellor
Academic Personnel

 




August 21, 2001

TO:       Deans and Provosts

FROM:  Donna L. Vredevoe, Ph.D.
             Vice Chancellor, Academic Personnel

RE:        New APM Policy regarding Conflict of Commitment and Outside Activities
             of Faculty Members

APM 025 has been revised to include implementation of a new policy regarding outside activities of faculty members.  As you may recall, the proposed revision was provided to you (by former Vice Chancellor Abrams) for campus comment last fall.  President Atkinson formally approved the revised APM 025, effective July 1, 2001.  Two additional related changes—in APM 662 (bearing on compensation for additional teaching), and APM 740-19 (on compensation during sabbatical leave)—are also effective as of July 1, 2001.

As you will see from the enclosed copies of the new APM policies, the changes will no doubt affect the faculty in a significant way.  The policy regarding outside activities requires new reporting requirements and oversight mechanisms to ensure fair and equitable implementation.  Faculty members will need to be informed as promptly as possible regarding the new requirements, a key provision being that faculty must obtain prior approval before engaging in certain specified types of activities (those classified in APM 025 as “Category 1”).

I plan to distribute these revised APM policies to the faculty in the very near future, and, in cooperation with the Academic Senate, to establish an oversight mechanism to ensure effective administration of the new rules.  I call your attention specifically to the fact that, since APM 025 was effective July 1, 2001, review of existing Category 1 activities is mandated for the current academic year.  We will need to move expeditiously to seek conformity with the “prior approval” process (as indicated in APM 025, Appendix B).

Please review the enclosed documents and provide me with your comments or questions so that we can move promptly to implement the new policies.  Please provide any commentary you may have by September 15, 2001.

cc:       Chancellor Carnesale
            Executive Vice Chancellor Rory H. Hume
            Vice Chancellor Roberto Peccei
            Chair Academic Senate Stephen Yeazell  


 

Please contact Vivian Rupert at x54857 for any questions
regarding Vice Chancellor Communiqués

Website last updated 7/02/2004


 

 

 

 

Policies & Procedures  |  Publications & Manuals  |  Forms & Checklists
Academic Employment Opportunities  |  Executive Searches  |  Faculty Diversity  |  Academic Listings
Salary Scales  |  Training Services  |  Related Sites  |  Academic Personnel Mission Statement
Academic Personnel Staff  |  Sitemap

 
                                        © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. Questions/Comments? Designed Andrew Yoon.